Once again, female hypergamy is used to attack men, as if female hypergamy even meant anything. See Oh No! Female Hypergamy. There is a recent article not written by but centered on a fellow named Rollo Tomassi here. In it, basically Rollo is talking about how women are being encouraged by popular society to have open sexual relationships which is apparently what women secretly want. He revels in his secret knowledge of women that he believes only himself and a select few other men know and dares anyone to challenge his opinion. If you disagree with him, then you are a mewling, pathetic, disgusting, loser, creep. There is so much wrong with this kind of talk, to start, hypergamy is obvious but people like him make it seem like Godzilla by comparison. Manosphere gurus need to tone it down, and stop attacking men when the problem isn’t them.
Did anyone seriously think that each woman was only physically capable of being attracted to one man on the planet? No, they didn’t, but that is how men think apparently(sarcasm). We all know that, whichever your beliefs, nature, God, or the universe didn’t predestine each woman to love only one man, and the same goes for men. There are many women an individual man could be attracted to, which is the same as male hypergamy. It makes no sense to say that women are unlike men in that sense and are more similar to special puzzle pieces that men must fit together with themselves thus making whoever some woman’s “match” is the only person she can love. People were meant to breed with each other, locations and timing change, so of course women can be attracted to different men. There is nothing wrong or intimidating about this, it is intuitive, it shouldn’t be made in to an outrageous ghoul that the manosphere likes to attack men for not believing in.
The real thing men dislike is when women have actually loved many men. Men don’t like it when there have been a variety of other penises inside of a woman he loves. So this is almost like the difference between potential gravitational energy and actual gravitational energy. Sure, women, can potentially love many men, but them having actually done so is quite a bit different. Men dislike the actual love of other men, and rightly so, it is very dangerous. A man who says not all women are like that, means, or should mean, that a woman who is not “like that” is like a virgin or one lacking in experience. Innocence is about actual physical things, not theoretical potential ones.
The manosphere needs to make these definitions succinct. It also needs to stop using language that is inflammatory that divides people on purpose. Some men might truly believe there is a special soul mate out there for him and she can only be attracted to himself, I doubt many, and I doubt anyone who isn’t a teenager. That caricature shouldn’t be used as a straw man to attack other men. The reality is that men can say not all women are like that and specifically mean that not all women are actually sluts.
